Concept of collective identity

Concept of corporal identicalnessIntroductionAlthough the concept of embodied individualism element is a post-colonial phenomenon, a few nations would describe themselves downstairs a collective identicalness before the modern whiles. In fact, atomic chip 63 is historically unique in terms that it has been the people vivification in the undefiled of atomic number 63 who experience persistently described themselves as europiumans since the 17th Century (Pagden, 2002). Indeed, European union emerged as the most consequential attempt for creating a inter field of study entity in the Continent and the best example of a Pan-European earthy indistinguishability as even the manner of speaking Europe and the European alliance argon being used as synonyms by millions of people any gradientreal day. Nevertheless, an uncertainty of a honey oil indistinguishability operator has incessantly been the case for Europeans end-to-end write up and the physical as well as soci al b launchs of Europe has never been distinctly known for centuries which atomic number 18 full of wars, meeting competition and blood.Today, the kindred problem continues to exist and many believe that it is the major factor blocking the efforts for achieving a fully integrated Europe, as the exposition and frontiers of a plebeian European identity operator is still unknown. Indeed, unitary of the most important issues of the European integration from a socio- policy-making billet is the vague concept of a normal European identity including prospects of European yoke Citizenship. Although a usual European identity has been long to a greater extent or less for centuries, these ar fairly new issues in relevancy to the half a century long memorial of instantlys European Union. that, I believe how the common European identity is define is very important for the time to come looks of the European integration project, as nowadays the EU is down the stairsgoing trans gradeation towards a political alliance with an aim to become a global actor in the inter internal political arna. What shall be the elements of a super C European identity, how shall it be formulized if it is to become a successful construct which would define Europe powerful to end the efforts that lasted for much(prenominal) a long time?I believe a triumphant common European identity must include the concrete and symbolic realities and it must be rooted to the assortment of cultures which had been created by the long history of Europe (DAppollonia, 2002). Otherwise, if it remains as a form of thin identity suggested by Habermas (2006), the problems and uncertainties of European identity as well as the poorly functioning European Union citizenship is most likely to exist in the Unions foreseeable future. In fact, a common European identity can save be successfully constructed by taking into account all the ambiguities, contradictions and developments in form of a angioten sin converting enzyme in diversity principle which can be applied to the reality of Europe quite a than building a shallow and artificial construct as it seems to be at once. Theoretically, a united Europe in political terms is made come-at-able if a united Europe in socialal terms is established through formulating a collective common identity which may more than than everyplace be conceived as a collection of multiple and complex values created by complicated dynamics of Europes long history. Nevertheless, a united Europe in cultural terms shall not mean to execute a homogenous and strictly ordered European nine rather the European identity shall solemnize Europes long tradition of diversity.An separate important question is how should European Union citizenship be defined and what should be the frontiers of cultural implications of such a political formulation. Considering the wide cultural diversity and long history that the individualistic sections of the European Union had parting in the European continent, a collective identity may splay to be far too complex to construct, so one may palisade that a common European identity is still an illusion. Although Europeans have a successfully formed a common stinting and more and more political union, they be still far away from the desired train of cultural union and a common identity which seems to be an alarming factor for the next symbolises of the European integration. Nonetheless, European Union citizenship is an area open to developments and it might be used as a hypercritically important spear by the European Union leaders to accumulate a common European identity, provided if it is formulized correctly. The critical evidence on the debate of European Union citizenship is that the dominant Classical Model of Citizenship is ground on the structures of nation-state and that is why this model cannot be applied to the European Union, as it is a whole polar level of organization whic h cannot be compared to a nation-state. On the opposite(a) hand, Post-National citizenship is a modern approach to the issue of European identity and my evaluation translates that it is a feasible solution suitable for todays Europe in order to take a shit its goals of unification and deepening through building a stronger common identity in the 21st Century.This motif is organized in several sections. European identity from a historical emplacement is analyzed in the first burst jingoisticic responses to the modern status of European identity and the issue of national identities in contrast to the common European identity is discussed in the following part a new European identity and suggestions for a new thought of common European identity is suggested in the third part a brief history of European Union efforts and cash advance on building a common identity is examined in the fourth part the current status of European Union Citizenship is discussed in the fifth part pa rt and finally, Post-National citizenship as a model for European Union citizenship is proposed in the last part of this paper. later on all, this paper argues that a common identity in form of a collective European identity is dischargely necessary for the Union at this stage of integration, and it is a life-or-death element for the future of the European integration project especially as our world is getting smaller as well as more fragmented simultaneously due to the complex dynamics of international relations every day at the age of globalization. European citizenship is very much connected to the issue of European identity and it is the gravestone to achieving such a strong common and collective identity when it is formulized as a Post-National phenomenon. The Europeans must withhold their power from the diversity of their cultures by building a thick identity for Europe rather than a thin identity which consists of me entrust political rights as yet the Europeans shall no t overlook the uniqueness of the Continent and the similarities they share in comparison to the rest of the world emphasized by the Unity in Diversity principle. Today, it is time for the Europeans to unite under one roof in socio-political terms, complete the long standing task of be the boundaries of the European well-manneredization by establishing a common and collective European identity in order to carry on the progress of the European integration project in a globalized world. Nonetheless, the question of possibilities of the Europeans to contact such a high level of cultural as well as political unity remains a question and it is subject to a whole different level of research. However, practically seen as a regional product of globalization itself, I believe the European integration project cannot progress any further without achieving a common European identity which is more critical than ever today in order to overcome the challenges of globalization in the 21st Centur y.What is Identity?Identity has always been a problematic concept because it is uncertain, fluid and highly flexible. Identity is the way to define ones self and to differentiate from the others. If interpreted literally, identity government agency equal identical. Identity is not static plainly dynamic, and it can be defined in different ways in different circumstances. Identity is construct, which cannot be constructed immediately but only in time. It is not a fixed, constant and pre-given entity while identity formation is heavily dependent on how one is perceived by the others. Identification implies belonging or membership, in turn which implies the exclusion of non-members (Bretherton Vogler, 1999 236). In other words, the sole purpose of identity is to separate self from the other in a palpate. nevertheless, identities are multiple in nature, or even kaleidoscopic. A person may have a whiz identity, but it will be made up of many levels of loyalty and identification (Vo n Benda-Beckmann Verkuyten, 1995 18). Meanwhile, identities change, because they are based on perceptions, which themselves change over time and environment as it is possible to identify ones self with more than one thing at a time such as class and gender, or piety and age. in that respectfore there are various elements of ones identity and which operate at different levels and these various elements in an identity may well be contradictory (Von Benda-Beckmann Verkuyten, 1995 12).On the other hand, a collective identity means the attitudes, which all members of that group have in common in their thoughts and behavior which differentiates them from the other (Munch, 2001 137). joint identities can provide existential meaning for people, thus they are primary means of unity in a society which give additional stability especially during periods of upheaval. Collective identities can generate a degree of continuity between individuals and their social environment, and can provide social recognition and approval (Von Benda-Beckmann Verkuyten, 1995 24). Therefore, collective identities are defined mainly by culture from a historical point of view rather than biological genes, ethnicity, patriotism or simple political rights. Finally, they are used to construct community and feelings of viscidness and holism, a concept to give the impression that all individuals are equal in the imagined community (Strath, 2002 387). From the perspective of political science there are two types of political identities a polite identity and a cultural identity. The cultural definition of political identity entails a sense of belonging of an individual towards a particular group which can mostly defined by its uniform cultural or ethnic values. On the other hand, the civic definition of political identity involves with the identification of an individual mostly in form of citizenry with a political structure, which includes political institutions, rights, duties and rules (Br uter, 2004 26). Therefore, a cultural European identity implies a reference to Europe as a continent, a civilization and a cultural entity whereas a civic European identity implies a reference to the political and institutional aspects of European Union identity more often than not in the form of EU citizenship.European Identity throughout HistoryEurope has always been more of a mental construct than a geographical or social entity (Lowenthal, 2000 314). Europe has no immanent frontiers both in geographic and sociological terms. Therefore it had never been easy to acquire a anomalous definition of European identity because the borders of Europe had always been dynamic, and no one knew where Europe started and Europe cease (Pagden, 2002). A European identity is an abstraction and a fiction without prerequisite proportions (Strath, 2002 387). The concept of a European identity is an caprice expressing artificial notions of unity rather than an identity of equality. In this sense , the concept of European identity is inscribed in a long history of political reflection on the concept of Europe. From the perspective of history, Europe has been united as a singular entity in various settings for a number of multiplication in its past such as the Roman Empire, the Holy Roman Empire, the Napoleonic Empire, and arguably the Nazi Third Reich. However, identity was only conceptualized as a macro-level collective phenomenon by the intellectual elites of Europe on the other hand, for the rural masses of Europe, identity was a local term associated with the micro-level, rarely the nation and never an incident as large as the continent of Europe (Pagden, 2002). In different period of history, a common European identity had been defined on different basis. In the Middle Ages, Christianity was the main delineate characteristic of European identity, whereas in modern propagation, the emergence of the nation state, periods of nationalism and later onwards democracy and secularism has been the common characteristic of the Europeans. Meanwhile, Christianity lost its dominance yet it arguably remained as one of the important components of European identity.Today, the European Union similar to the continent of Europe can be characterized by overlapping and unclear boundaries. From a geographical perspective, the EU has fuzzy boundaries due to the ongoing enlargement processes since the 1970s (Risse, 2003 490). Although the geographical borders of Europe are not objectively defined particularly in the East, a state without a geographical relevance to the European continent cannot become a part of the European Union, even if it shares the EUs collective values and norms. Moreover what adds to the uncertainty of Europes borders is that boundaries of the EU may change according to different policy fields such as the Schengen includes the non EU member Norway but at the same time it does not include the EU member state the United Kingdom. Therefore, before anything else the lack of solid geographical boundaries weaken efforts of the EU to be seen as a singular entity by its own people (Castano, 2004). Meanwhile, the geographic boundaries of Europe have suffered dramatic changes at bottom time and even the recent years provide an image of changing boundaries in Europe considering the reunion of Germany, the break-up of Yugoslavia and collapse of the Soviet Union. Therefore, Europe cannot be defined whole as a geographical space.On the contrary, Europe cannot be defined in cultural space either, unless European culture is associated with the Continents long history of diversity itself. Indeed, diversity shall be the main characteristic of European identity from a cultural point of view. Religious and cultural heritages including Roman law, political democracy, parliamentary institutions, Renaissance humanism, rationalism, romanticism characterize the common identity of the Europeans (Smith, 1992). On the other hand, there are undeni able socioeconomic, cultural, national and ethnic differences among the member states of the European Union. Nevertheless, the saying of the EU, unity in diversity, reflects this fact from a positive point of view and proposes a common identity for Europeans based on their peaceful diversity as a fundamental character of the European society at large.A collective political culture is an important feature of the common European identity. The Greeks gave Europe the science and philosophy and the Romans gave it the idea of single continent and unity which created Europes strong cultural and political origins. The various(a) and multiple cultures of the ancient Europe shared out a single identity as they were brought together under a common system of Roman law. The people of Europe also shared a common language, Latin, and after Europe slowly converted to Christianity they acquired a common religion as well. Christianity has been a crucial part of the European identity and it played a key role to create its internal cohesion and to designate its relationship with the rest of the world. Further references are made to Europes identity besides its heritage of Graeco-Roman civilization and Christianity such as the ideas of the Enlightenment, Science, Reason, Progress, Industrialization, Democracy and Individualization as the core elements of this claimed European legacy (Wintle, 1996 13-16). Hellenism, Romanticism, public assistance society and cross-fertilization of diversity can be added to this list (Garcia, 1993 7-9), while one may argue that Europes core values include its commitments to an undivided continent, to individual freedom, and to the universalism of humanity (Havel, 1996).However, this unity never reached to the point of sacramental manduction a common European culture up to this point in history of the Continent. In fact, a single body of citizenry or a common cultural identity could not be reached even in the peak of Europes history of unity a nd solidarity. When the differences deep down Europe are emphasized, they are often in the form of unity in diversity religious differences such as Catholic, Protestant and Jewish-Orthodox Christianity, and linguistic differences including Romance, Germanic and Slavic languages are obvious yet they are seen as correlated, Catholic-Romance, Protestant-Germanic, Orthodox-Slavic, and essentially are underlying the major ethnic cleavages and conflicts in the history of Europe (Wintle, 1996). Anthony Smith is among the scholars who are skeptical of the misfortune of a common European identity because they could not find a common culture crosswise the European continent, and even more critically they claim that Europe lacks of a shared set of myths, meet and symbols these elements which they find crucial to create post-national identity (Smith, 1992 72-73). Furthermore, Europe lacks of a shared historical and cultural suffice as which is the largest source of division among Europeans . Other obstacles to a common European identity include linguistic diversity and its tripartite religious division. In fact, a major difference among EU countries is the persistence of linguistic diversity, even though in practical level English has become the dominant language in Europe. Language does not only have an instrumental but also an emotional dimension and peoples sense of nationality is often tied up with their mother tongue (Guibernau, 2001 192). Finally, confrontation, wars and the effort to establish clear differences between peoples of the continent dominate the history of Europe, which is the exact opposite of what the European Union seeks to achieve today.On the other side of the debate, scholars such as Michael Wintle are more optimistic on the possibility of creating a European identity. Indeed, the founding of the EU identity in the form of converging education standards, educational exchanges, and the organization of a European civil society is already establi shed in most parts of Europe. Wintle argues that a European identity was previously already created during the high Middle Age (Wintle, 1996 19-22), and it can be easily established today considering the forces of globalization. For now, the major success of the EU in fostering its identity has been limited with the increasing free feat of people across European borders, which has accelerated since the 1985 and formalized in 1990 Schengen accords parallelly correlated with the rising impact of globalization. increase interaction among peoples of Europe would also encourage cultural exchanges and this could foster a stronger sense of a shared community. Education and high culture shall play a key role in European Unions cultural policy which has critical importance for building a thick European identity, because these two factors have an important effect on the creation as well as promotion of the EU identity. Education is plainly one of the crucial dimensions in any attempt to dev elop the future identity of the EU or at least more understanding and convergence among Europeans high culture unites Europeans against the low culture which separates them. after all, the development of the EU identity will be the outcome of a long process in which bottom-up as well as top-down initiatives are likely to be employed (Guibernau, 2001 183-184).The idea of Europe as well as the identity of Europeans are constructed over time with processes of contention and bargaining. Gerard Delanty argues that a European Culture is not an entity with cohesion and fixed boundaries, but a floppy concept, with no clear borders and with internal opposition and contradictions, discursively shaped in contentious social bargaining processes (Delanty, 1995 1999). In other words, the images of Europe do not exist as a natural phenomenon but are discursively shaped by internal as well as external forces (Strath, 2002). A basic step in the process of creating a collective identity is to defini ng itself in relation to the other. Central to ones identifications are images of others. Likewise any identity, European identity necessarily contains an element of separation from the non-European. The boundaries of Europe can only be drawn and the identity of Europe can only be realized in the reverberate of others. Indeed, Europe does not exist without non-Europe and that non-Europe does not exist without Europe (Wintle, 1996). Many centuries ago, the Europeans defined people living in the north as uncivilized and people living in the south as oriental (Pagden, 2002). Furthermore, the Greeks labeled the non-Greek speaking people as barbarians, even if that word would for certain have a different meaning by that time. In nearer times, although the Russians shared many features with a European society including the same religion, it could not reach the formal limits of a Romanized civilization thus perceived as a atrocious empire or the orient, depending on the time. Moreover, European belief of its superiority relied on the common features of European societies such as science and liberal arts. Thus the rest of the world could only be portrayed as actors in relation to Europe, in other words always remained as the other.According to Delanty, Europe has been always invented and reinvented on the basis of division and strategy for the construction of difference from the other starting from Christian identity against Islam in the Middle-Ages, after that in the colonial politics to the New World, and to the ethnic minorities in the contemporary European Union (Delanty, 1995). Therefore, historical experience suggests that the new European identity may be constructed on the other which may be the United States, the East, Islam or the European past itself. Samuel Huntington has argued that religion provides the best common means of historically distinguishing between Europeans and the other, especially in terms of the confrontation between the Judeo-Christian tradition and Islam (Huntington, 1996). However, at the same time, the separation between Eastern Orthodox Christianity and Western variations of Christianity has, for a long time, been crucial in establishing a division between Western and Eastern Europe partially reinforced in the ratty War, divisions between Catholicism and Protestantism and separation between North and South (Guibernau, 2001). Therefore, history shows that peoples of Europe has been united against peoples of other civilizations at times such as global upheaval and wars while at other times Europeans get divided and separated due to the face that they may perceive the other internally.Today, the European Union is frequently argued to be a fortress for the other and the EU is often referred to as a Christian Club, because historically all states on the continent of Europe had Christian societies. The Ottoman Empire was the greatest foeman of European states as well as Christianity in the Middle Ages which made Islam the primary characteristic of the other for Europeans from the perspective of history. Today, the accession dialogues of Turkey into the European Union raise wide public opposition in Europe while the European Union officials make constant efforts to prove their allegiance to non-religious, non-ethnic but solely liberal and non discriminatory Copenhagen Criteria independent from historical aspects of the other which has actually been extensively used to define the European identity. Finally, Europe is unique because it has possessed an identity as a cultural space which gave birth to political unions throughout its historyhowever, it has never succeeded to constitute a single nation-state or a unified ethnic group. Although the European Union with its single currency and supranational political and legal institutions changed these historical facts to an extent, it is only possible with the means of a common European identity which will carry Europe to the next stage of integra tion that it always aimed but failed to achieve during its long history. Nevertheless, history has already proved that it will surely be hard to overcome uncertainties of a common European identity at the level of the masses.oer the past millennium, the advancements of European civilization gave rise to the elites living on the continent of Europe who feel increasingly attached to Europe as a whole and shared dreams of a united continent. However, Europe as a realm sharing a common history as well as a common destiny has been largely abandoned by fixed prejudices on often nationalistic and ethnic grounds. National interests and biases at local, national, and global levels have prevented the masses of European people from viewing themselves collectively (Lowenthal, 2000 315). However today, forces of globalization, advancements in communications technologies and popular culture now promote the sense of being European among big segments of society other than the European elites. Alth ough a truly trans-European society is still far away, many of its essential elements are already in place this time largely due to the forces of globalization. Most European states are increasingly democratic their economies are for the most part market driven their popular culture grows more homogeneous as communication technologies expand under the forces of globalization in the 21st Century (Waterman, 1999 23). Therefore, Europe is at the stage of defining its identity today however which criteria are being deployed to define Europe, Europeans, Europeanness and their several(prenominal) boundaries is critically important. A common European identity must be constructed by defining and understanding the historical roots of outstanding features of the European society in relation to the notion of citizenship, which will be discussed in depth in the following parts of this paper developed in the past over the land of Europe. For sure, Europe is being redefined as a result of a comp lex set of processes, but an important question is what sort of Europe is emerging from them?Nationalist Responses to European IdentityThere is sure enough a structured symmetry in the perception of the European Union as the coincidence of a homogenized socio-political space, a unified regulatory space of an EU super-state, a singular European civil society surpassing existing national and regional differences in culture and identity (Hudson, 2000). In both(prenominal) respects there has been progress towards such an ideal of European common European cultural and a trans-national civil society. For example, the Council of Europe and the European Convention on Human Rights have had an important role in defining acceptable standards across Europe. The issue of European identity and the criteria used to denote Europeans is clearly a critical one for the political and social integrity of the European Union. Europe will exist as an unquestionable political community only when European identity permeates peoples lives and daily existence (Demos 1998). Identity is a key issue which is continuously changing and thats the reason why it is so hard to define especially in a world of fast changes in the 21st Centurys globalization. The member states of todays enlarged EU have become multi-ethnic and multi-cultural societies with various structural phenomenon ranging from the immigrant community of France to Post-Communist yet ethnic communities of the Central and Eastern European states. As the EU expanded eastwards in the last two rounds of enlargements, the issue of defining a European identity became even more critical for sake of integrity and stability of the Union.One innovation of a singular European identity would see it constructed through a process similar to that touch in the creation of national identities in the 19th and the 20th Centuries. Ironically, while the aim was to create those national identities in the past, the challenge that Europeans face tod ay would be to transcend them for the creation of a trans-national understanding of Europeannes. However, the current trends at local European level are quite different from the interests of Europeanists at the supranational level. There are pressures from nation-states and their citizens to resist any further transfer of national sovereignty as well as erosion of national identity (Hudson, 2000). In fact, the success of extreme right wing political parties in important European countries such as Austria and France in recent years may be seen as a sign of the reappearance of dangerous nationalist and racist ambitions which the peoples of Europe have most in all likelihood experienced more than any other continent in the world history.Eric Hobsbawm has proclaimed that nationalism is groundless (Hobsbawm, 1990). On the contrary, Llobera argues that national identities are certainly not eternal, but the time of their demise has not yet arrived (Llobera, 2003). In fact, national ident ities are still dominant in Europe as recent Eurobarometer surveys show that people in Europe prefer maintaining their national identity and sovereignty but increasing number of people have accepted European identity in addition to their national identities. Therefore, European nationalism is another important component of a common European identity and it has been a major ideological tool for unifying nation states as well as the Europeans as a whole throughout Europes history. To start with, the European Union, with its both intergovernmental and supranational characteristics represents a far different type of state-organization than a genuine nation state. The main distinguishing characteristics of the EU from the nation-state are the absence of a shared language, a uniform media, common education system and most importantly a central state structure (Shore, 2000 64). Furthermore, the powers of the EU rely on the sharing of sovereignty of its member states which may often have conflicting national interests. Indeed, the European integration project has mainly served as a tool for progressively limiting individual nation-states to invest any kind of harmful nationalism and this makes up an important part of the European identity. At this point, nationalist Euroskeptics may argue that building a common Europe and an identity for it means destroying nations. However, a general feeling of Europeanness and loyalty to Europe in a cultural sense, does not need to conflict with national identities (Andreani, 1999).A successful construct of European identity must include the concrete and symbolic realities created within history of the Continent but exclude nationalist ambitions of the past. Surely, the European states have not always been nationalist through Europes long history. The definition of nationalism counts on the idea of nation and territory while the definition of a European nationalism depends on the historical and ideological evolution of the Europe an nation states and aspirations for a post-national Europe. In fact, the aspirations that underlie in the roots of the foundation of the European Union are parallel to European cosmopolitanism in the 18th and the 19th centuries. From the Enlightenment to the beginning of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) after the Second World War European nationalism found two separate meanings one as an antinational Pan-European idea of a new united Europe that limits the sovereignty of the nation states, and the other as a pro-national ideology to create or legitimate new nation states (DAppollonia, 2002).Historically, cosmopolitanism reflected intentions for a European unity, and gave rise to anti-national European nationalism. European nationalism was characterized by the will to protect the European interests and its supremacy from non-Europeans as well as protecting Europe from itself by creating a federation. It can be argued that economic development, comme